CA/Browser Forum posts
Posts by tag Server Certificates
Ballot 26 – Certificate Reissuance
March 17, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 26 – Certificate Reissuance (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Ben Wilson and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
March 17, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 26 – Certificate Reissuance (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Ben Wilson and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines
February 13, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines (Passed Unanimously) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion and it was endorsed by Ben Wilson and Johnathan Nightingale. Motion begins Effective 13 Feb 2009, the EV Processing Requirements should be amended in accordance with the following erratum. For inclusion of an EV CA, the current EV Processing Requirements refer to “an acceptable audit program” whereas the EV Guidelines are more specific in Section J, referring to “equivalent audit procedures approved by the CA/Browser Forum”. At this time the only approved procedures are the (i) WebTrust Program for CAs audit and (ii) WebTrust EV Program audit. Equivalent audit procedures for ETSI are currently being developed, and will soon be considered by the CA/B Forum for approval.
February 13, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines (Passed Unanimously) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion and it was endorsed by Ben Wilson and Johnathan Nightingale. Motion begins Effective 13 Feb 2009, the EV Processing Requirements should be amended in accordance with the following erratum. For inclusion of an EV CA, the current EV Processing Requirements refer to “an acceptable audit program” whereas the EV Guidelines are more specific in Section J, referring to “equivalent audit procedures approved by the CA/Browser Forum”. At this time the only approved procedures are the (i) WebTrust Program for CAs audit and (ii) WebTrust EV Program audit. Equivalent audit procedures for ETSI are currently being developed, and will soon be considered by the CA/B Forum for approval.
Ballot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines
January 16, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines (Passed) Motion Tim Moses made the following motion, which was endorsed by Bjorn Vermo and Charlie Buckley. Motion begins The EV Processing Guidelines at …
January 16, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines (Passed) Motion Tim Moses made the following motion, which was endorsed by Bjorn Vermo and Charlie Buckley. Motion begins The EV Processing Guidelines at …
Ballot 22 – RSA 1024 Retirement
December 29, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 22 – RSA 1024 Retirement (Unanimously Passed) Motion Robin Alden made the following motion, and Steve Medin and Moudrick Dadashov endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
December 29, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 22 – RSA 1024 Retirement (Unanimously Passed) Motion Robin Alden made the following motion, and Steve Medin and Moudrick Dadashov endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
Ballot 21 – Phone Number at Place of Business
December 4, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 21 – Phone Number at Place of Business (Passed Unanimously) Motion Ken Bretschneider made the following motion, and Nick Hales and Bruce Morton endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
December 4, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 21 – Phone Number at Place of Business (Passed Unanimously) Motion Ken Bretschneider made the following motion, and Nick Hales and Bruce Morton endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
Ballot 19 – Authoritative Time Source
November 7, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 19 – Authoritative Time Source (Passed Unanimously) Motion Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Peri Drucker and Bjørn Vermo endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
November 7, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 19 – Authoritative Time Source (Passed Unanimously) Motion Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Peri Drucker and Bjørn Vermo endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
Ballot 18 – Pre-Approved Requests
September 16, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 18 – Pre-Approved Requests (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Tony Berman endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
September 16, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 18 – Pre-Approved Requests (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Tony Berman endorsed it. Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended in accordance with the following erratum.
Ballot 16- Unverified Content
July 25, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 16- Unverified Content (Failed) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Nick Hales endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
July 25, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 16- Unverified Content (Failed) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Nick Hales endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 15 – Certificate Renewal
July 25, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 15 – Certificate Renewal (Passed Unanimously) Motion Nick Hales has made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Tony Berman have endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
July 25, 2008 by Ben WilsonBallot 15 – Certificate Renewal (Passed Unanimously) Motion Nick Hales has made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Tony Berman have endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.