CA/Browser Forum posts
Posts by tag Server Certificates
Ballot 30 – Reserved Domain Names
August 7, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 30 – Reserved Domain Names (Failed) Motion Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg and Bruce Morton endorsed it. Motion begins Effective 90 days following ratification of the ballot, the Guidelines should be amended by the following errata.
August 7, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 30 – Reserved Domain Names (Failed) Motion Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg and Bruce Morton endorsed it. Motion begins Effective 90 days following ratification of the ballot, the Guidelines should be amended by the following errata.
Ballot 31 – Allow ETSI 102 042
August 6, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 31 – Allow ETSI 102 042 (Passed) Motion Iñigo Barreira has made the following motion, and Bjorn Vermo and Tom Albertson have endorsed it: Motion begins On page 3, replace: “Other groups that have participated in the process of developing these Guidelines include members of the Information Security Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science & Technology Law, and WebTrust for CA. Participation by such groups does not imply their endorsement, recommendation or approval of the final product.” With: “Other groups that have participated in the process of developing these Guidelines include members of the Information Security Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science & Technology Law, WebTrust for CA and ETSI ESI. Participation by such groups does not imply their endorsement, recommendation or approval of the final product.”
August 6, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 31 – Allow ETSI 102 042 (Passed) Motion Iñigo Barreira has made the following motion, and Bjorn Vermo and Tom Albertson have endorsed it: Motion begins On page 3, replace: “Other groups that have participated in the process of developing these Guidelines include members of the Information Security Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science & Technology Law, and WebTrust for CA. Participation by such groups does not imply their endorsement, recommendation or approval of the final product.” With: “Other groups that have participated in the process of developing these Guidelines include members of the Information Security Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science & Technology Law, WebTrust for CA and ETSI ESI. Participation by such groups does not imply their endorsement, recommendation or approval of the final product.”
Ballot 33- Subject Attribute Requirements
August 4, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 33- Subject Attribute Requirements (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Johnathan Nightingale and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
August 4, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 33- Subject Attribute Requirements (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Johnathan Nightingale and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 32 – Revocation for Well-Known Private Key
July 29, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 32 – Revocation for Well-Known Private Key (Passed Unanimously) Motion Bruce Morton made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg and Nick Hales endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
July 29, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 32 – Revocation for Well-Known Private Key (Passed Unanimously) Motion Bruce Morton made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg and Nick Hales endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 29 – Guidelines Renumbering
July 14, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 29 – Guidelines Renumbering (Passed) Motion Tim Moses has made the following motion, and Bjorn Vermo and Nick Hales have endorsed it: Motion begins Effective upon ratification of Version 1.2, the Guidelines should be renumbered in accordance with the following table.
July 14, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 29 – Guidelines Renumbering (Passed) Motion Tim Moses has made the following motion, and Bjorn Vermo and Nick Hales have endorsed it: Motion begins Effective upon ratification of Version 1.2, the Guidelines should be renumbered in accordance with the following table.
Ballot 27 – Alternatives for Verifying Domain Control
May 26, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 27 – Alternatives for Verifying Domain Control (Rejected) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Bjørn Vermo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
May 26, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 27 – Alternatives for Verifying Domain Control (Rejected) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Bjørn Vermo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 25 – PolicyQualifierld
April 6, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 25 – PolicyQualifierld Motion Mads Henriksveen made the following motion, and Tim Moses and Robin Alden endorsed it: Motion begins Effective upon ratification of the ballot, the Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
April 6, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 25 – PolicyQualifierld Motion Mads Henriksveen made the following motion, and Tim Moses and Robin Alden endorsed it: Motion begins Effective upon ratification of the ballot, the Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 26 – Certificate Reissuance
March 17, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 26 – Certificate Reissuance (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Ben Wilson and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
March 17, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 26 – Certificate Reissuance (Passed Unanimously) Motion Steve Roylance made the following motion, and Ben Wilson and Jay Schiavo endorsed it: Motion begins The Guidelines should be amended by the following erratum.
Ballot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines
February 13, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines (Passed Unanimously) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion and it was endorsed by Ben Wilson and Johnathan Nightingale. Motion begins Effective 13 Feb 2009, the EV Processing Requirements should be amended in accordance with the following erratum. For inclusion of an EV CA, the current EV Processing Requirements refer to “an acceptable audit program” whereas the EV Guidelines are more specific in Section J, referring to “equivalent audit procedures approved by the CA/Browser Forum”. At this time the only approved procedures are the (i) WebTrust Program for CAs audit and (ii) WebTrust EV Program audit. Equivalent audit procedures for ETSI are currently being developed, and will soon be considered by the CA/B Forum for approval.
February 13, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 24 – Acceptable Audits in EV Processing Guidelines (Passed Unanimously) Motion Stephen Davidson made the following motion and it was endorsed by Ben Wilson and Johnathan Nightingale. Motion begins Effective 13 Feb 2009, the EV Processing Requirements should be amended in accordance with the following erratum. For inclusion of an EV CA, the current EV Processing Requirements refer to “an acceptable audit program” whereas the EV Guidelines are more specific in Section J, referring to “equivalent audit procedures approved by the CA/Browser Forum”. At this time the only approved procedures are the (i) WebTrust Program for CAs audit and (ii) WebTrust EV Program audit. Equivalent audit procedures for ETSI are currently being developed, and will soon be considered by the CA/B Forum for approval.
Ballot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines
January 16, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines (Passed) Motion Tim Moses made the following motion, which was endorsed by Bjorn Vermo and Charlie Buckley. Motion begins The EV Processing Guidelines at …
January 16, 2009 by Ben WilsonBallot 23 – EV Processing Guidelines (Passed) Motion Tim Moses made the following motion, which was endorsed by Bjorn Vermo and Charlie Buckley. Motion begins The EV Processing Guidelines at …