CA/Browser Forum posts
Posts by tag Ballot
Notice of IPR Review Period for Amendments to Baseline Requirements per Ballots 112 and 120
July 7, 2014 by Ben WilsonPursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forum’s IPR Policy, this is notice of the commencement of a 30-day IPR maintenance-guideline review period by which certain provisions of the IPR will become applicable to these recent changes made to the Baseline Requirements by Ballots 112 and 120. Ballot 112 replaced “Internal Server Name” with use of the term “Internal Name” in the Baseline Requirements Ballot 120 made certain changes to the Baseline Requirements concerning the ability of Affiliates to verify domain registration, ownership, or control on behalf of an Applicant.
July 7, 2014 by Ben WilsonPursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forum’s IPR Policy, this is notice of the commencement of a 30-day IPR maintenance-guideline review period by which certain provisions of the IPR will become applicable to these recent changes made to the Baseline Requirements by Ballots 112 and 120. Ballot 112 replaced “Internal Server Name” with use of the term “Internal Name” in the Baseline Requirements Ballot 120 made certain changes to the Baseline Requirements concerning the ability of Affiliates to verify domain registration, ownership, or control on behalf of an Applicant.
Ballot 124 – Business Entity Clarification (passed)
June 5, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 124 – Business Entity Clarification Voting closed on June 5, 2014. We received votes in favor from Actalis, ANF, Buypass, DigiCert, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy.com, Logius PKIoverheid, Mozilla, QuoVadis, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, TURKTRUST, OpenTrust, and WoSign. There were no votes against and no abstentions. Therefore, Ballot 124 passed. The EV Guidelines Working Group identified an erroneous cross-reference in the first sentence of Section 11.2.2(3) (Business Entity Subjects). Joanna Fox of GoDaddy made the following motion, and Cecilia Kam of Symantec and Ben Wilson from DigiCert have endorsed it.
June 5, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 124 – Business Entity Clarification Voting closed on June 5, 2014. We received votes in favor from Actalis, ANF, Buypass, DigiCert, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy.com, Logius PKIoverheid, Mozilla, QuoVadis, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, TURKTRUST, OpenTrust, and WoSign. There were no votes against and no abstentions. Therefore, Ballot 124 passed. The EV Guidelines Working Group identified an erroneous cross-reference in the first sentence of Section 11.2.2(3) (Business Entity Subjects). Joanna Fox of GoDaddy made the following motion, and Cecilia Kam of Symantec and Ben Wilson from DigiCert have endorsed it.
Ballot 120 – Affiliate Authority to Verify Domain (passed)
June 5, 2014 by Ben WilsonVoting closed on June 5, 2014. We received votes in favor from Actalis, ANF, Buypass, DigiCert, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy.com, Logius PKIoverheid, Mozilla, QuoVadis, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, TURKTRUST, OpenTrust, and WoSign. There were no votes against and no abstentions. Therefore, Ballot 120 passed. Kirk Hall of TrendMicro made the following motion and Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Cecilia Kam of Symantec have endorsed it: Ballot 120 – Affiliate Authority to Verify Domain Reasons for proposed ballot Ballot 72 in May 2012 reorganized the EV Guidelines by moving certain definitions and common provisions to the Baseline Requirements and replacing them with cross references to the Baseline Requirements.
June 5, 2014 by Ben WilsonVoting closed on June 5, 2014. We received votes in favor from Actalis, ANF, Buypass, DigiCert, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy.com, Logius PKIoverheid, Mozilla, QuoVadis, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, TURKTRUST, OpenTrust, and WoSign. There were no votes against and no abstentions. Therefore, Ballot 120 passed. Kirk Hall of TrendMicro made the following motion and Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Cecilia Kam of Symantec have endorsed it: Ballot 120 – Affiliate Authority to Verify Domain Reasons for proposed ballot Ballot 72 in May 2012 reorganized the EV Guidelines by moving certain definitions and common provisions to the Baseline Requirements and replacing them with cross references to the Baseline Requirements.
Ballot 122 – Verified Method of Communication (failed)
May 8, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 122 – Verified Method of Communication Voting on Ballot 122 closed. We received “yes” votes from Actalis, Buypass, Comodo, DigiCert, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, QuoVadis, SECOM, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, TURKTRUST, Visa, and WoSign OpenTrust and SSC abstained. Mozilla and Microsoft voted “no.” Therefore, Ballot 122 did not pass. The EV Guidelines Working Group has completed its review of Section 11.4.2 of the EV Guidelines (Telephone Number for Applicant’s Place of Business).
May 8, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 122 – Verified Method of Communication Voting on Ballot 122 closed. We received “yes” votes from Actalis, Buypass, Comodo, DigiCert, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, QuoVadis, SECOM, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, TURKTRUST, Visa, and WoSign OpenTrust and SSC abstained. Mozilla and Microsoft voted “no.” Therefore, Ballot 122 did not pass. The EV Guidelines Working Group has completed its review of Section 11.4.2 of the EV Guidelines (Telephone Number for Applicant’s Place of Business).
Ballot 121 – EV Guidelines Insurance Requirements(failed)
May 7, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 121 – EV Guidelines Insurance Requirements Voting has closed on Ballot 121. “Yes” votes were cast by Buypass, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Izenpe, OpenTrust, SSC, Trend Micro, Turktrust, and WoSign. “No” votes were cast by Actalis, DigiCert, QuoVadis, Symantec, and Mozilla. Abstentions were submitted by StartCom, Visa, and Google. Therefore, Ballot 121 failed. The EV Guidelines Working Group is considering updating the EV Guidelines in a number of areas. Kirk Hall of Trend Micro hereby makes the following motion, and Moudrick Dadashov from Skaitmeninio sertifikavimo centras (SSC) and Richard Wang from WoSign have endorsed it.
May 7, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 121 – EV Guidelines Insurance Requirements Voting has closed on Ballot 121. “Yes” votes were cast by Buypass, Disig, Firmaprofesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Izenpe, OpenTrust, SSC, Trend Micro, Turktrust, and WoSign. “No” votes were cast by Actalis, DigiCert, QuoVadis, Symantec, and Mozilla. Abstentions were submitted by StartCom, Visa, and Google. Therefore, Ballot 121 failed. The EV Guidelines Working Group is considering updating the EV Guidelines in a number of areas. Kirk Hall of Trend Micro hereby makes the following motion, and Moudrick Dadashov from Skaitmeninio sertifikavimo centras (SSC) and Richard Wang from WoSign have endorsed it.
Ballot 112 – Replace Definition of “Internal Server Name” with “Internal Name”(passed)
April 3, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 112 – Replace Definition of “Internal Server Name” with “Internal Name” Votes in Favor: ANF, Buypass, Comodo, DigiCert, Disig, FirmaProfesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Logius PKIoverheid, QuoVadis, Sertifitseerimiskeskus, SSC, StartCom, SwissSign, Symantec,Trend Micro, Trustis, TURKTRUST, TAIWAN-CA, WoSign, Mozilla and Google No abstentions or nay votes. Ballot passed. The current definition of Internal Server Name is ambiguous. It reads, “A Server Name (which may or may not include an Unregistered Domain Name) that is not resolvable using the public DNS.
April 3, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 112 – Replace Definition of “Internal Server Name” with “Internal Name” Votes in Favor: ANF, Buypass, Comodo, DigiCert, Disig, FirmaProfesional, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, Logius PKIoverheid, QuoVadis, Sertifitseerimiskeskus, SSC, StartCom, SwissSign, Symantec,Trend Micro, Trustis, TURKTRUST, TAIWAN-CA, WoSign, Mozilla and Google No abstentions or nay votes. Ballot passed. The current definition of Internal Server Name is ambiguous. It reads, “A Server Name (which may or may not include an Unregistered Domain Name) that is not resolvable using the public DNS.
Ballot 119 – Remove “OfIncorporation” from OID descriptions in EVG 9.2.5(passed)
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 119 – Remove “OfIncorporation” from OID descriptions in EVG 9.2.5 Yea: ANF, Certinomis, Comodo, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla. Nay: None Abstain: None Result: Ballot passed Rob Stradling of Comodo made the following motion, and Ben Wilson from DigiCert and Chema López González from AC Firmaprofesional S.A. have endorsed it. The EV Guidelines require certificates to include the jurisdiction where the Subject has registered or incorporated.
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 119 – Remove “OfIncorporation” from OID descriptions in EVG 9.2.5 Yea: ANF, Certinomis, Comodo, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla. Nay: None Abstain: None Result: Ballot passed Rob Stradling of Comodo made the following motion, and Ben Wilson from DigiCert and Chema López González from AC Firmaprofesional S.A. have endorsed it. The EV Guidelines require certificates to include the jurisdiction where the Subject has registered or incorporated.
Ballot 117 – EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections(passed)
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 117 – EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections Yea: ANF, Certinomis, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Microsoft, and Mozilla. Nay: Comodo, Network Solutions, and Google. Abstain: Buypass Results: Ballot passed Updated version is posted here on the EV Code Signing page. Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert made the following motion, and Iñigo Barreira of Izenpe and Rick Andrews of Symantec endorsed it.
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 117 – EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections Yea: ANF, Certinomis, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Microsoft, and Mozilla. Nay: Comodo, Network Solutions, and Google. Abstain: Buypass Results: Ballot passed Updated version is posted here on the EV Code Signing page. Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert made the following motion, and Iñigo Barreira of Izenpe and Rick Andrews of Symantec endorsed it.
Ballot 116 – Bylaw Amendment for Associate Member Category(passed)
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 116 – Associate Member Category Yea: ANF, Certinomis, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Microsoft, and Mozilla Nay: None Abstain: None Results: Ballot passed Ben Wilson of DigiCert made the following motion, and Dean Coclin from Symantec and Ryan Sleevi from Google endorsed it: Motion Begins In order to reconcile the CA/Browser Forum’s Bylaws with its current operational practices, including the recognition of Associate Members and the use of a single IPR Agreement with Interested Parties and the absence of a Participation Agreement, the following amendments should be made to the Bylaws:
March 24, 2014 by Ben WilsonBallot 116 – Associate Member Category Yea: ANF, Certinomis, DigiCert, GlobalSign, Izenpe, Logius PKIoverheid, OpenTrust, QuoVadis, SECOM Trust, SSC, StartCom, Symantec, Trend Micro, Trustis, WoSign, Microsoft, and Mozilla Nay: None Abstain: None Results: Ballot passed Ben Wilson of DigiCert made the following motion, and Dean Coclin from Symantec and Ryan Sleevi from Google endorsed it: Motion Begins In order to reconcile the CA/Browser Forum’s Bylaws with its current operational practices, including the recognition of Associate Members and the use of a single IPR Agreement with Interested Parties and the absence of a Participation Agreement, the following amendments should be made to the Bylaws:
Ballot 110 – Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the Bylaws(failed)
February 6, 2014 by Ben WilsonWith 6 “yes” votes from CAs (Digicert, Symantec, TrendMicro, Disig, GlobalSign, and SECOM) and 2 “no” votes from Browsers (Mozilla and Google), Ballot 110 made quorum but did not pass. On 22 January 2014, Ben Wilson of DigiCert made the following motion, endorsed by Robin Alden of Comodo and Dean Coclin of Symantec: –Motion Begins– Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum adopts the attached CA-Browser Forum Bylaws v.
February 6, 2014 by Ben WilsonWith 6 “yes” votes from CAs (Digicert, Symantec, TrendMicro, Disig, GlobalSign, and SECOM) and 2 “no” votes from Browsers (Mozilla and Google), Ballot 110 made quorum but did not pass. On 22 January 2014, Ben Wilson of DigiCert made the following motion, endorsed by Robin Alden of Comodo and Dean Coclin of Symantec: –Motion Begins– Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum adopts the attached CA-Browser Forum Bylaws v.