Tag Archives: Code Signing

This ballot number was reserved.

Special Ballot CSCWG-5: Election of Code Signing Certificate Working Group Vice Chair The following motion has been proposed by the Code Signing Certificate Working Group Chair Dean Coclin of DigiCert. Purpose of Ballot This special ballot is to confirm the new Vice Chair of the Code Signing Certificate Working Group. — MOTION BEGINS — In accordance with Bylaw 4.1©, Bruce …

Voting on this ballot has closed. The results are below: 7 CAs voting in favor: Actalis, DigiCert, Entrust Datacard, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA 0 CAs opposed 0 CAs abstaining 1 Certificate Consumer voting in favor: Microsoft 0 Certificate Consumers opposed 0 Certificate Consumers abstaining Therefore the ballot passes. Dean Coclin CSCWG Chair Ballot CSC-4 v1: Move deadline for transition to …

Ballot Results Voting on Ballot CSCWG-3 has ended and the results are below: Certificate Issuers Votes in Favor: (9) Actalis, DigiCert, eMudhra, Entrust, GDCA, GlobalSign, HARICA, SSL.com, SecureTrust (former Trustwave) Votes opposed: None Abstentions: None Certificate Consumers Votes in Favor: (1) Microsoft Votes Opposed: None Abstentions: None Therefore the Ballot passes. Ballot Content The following motion has been proposed by …

Ballot Results Voting on Ballot CSCWG-2 has ended and the results are below: Certificate Issuers Votes in Favor: (10) Actalis, Sectigo, DigiCert, eMudhra, Entrust Datacard, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, SSL.com Votes opposed: None Abstentions: None Certificate Consumers Votes in Favor: (1) Microsoft Votes Opposed: None Abstentions: None Results Therefore the Ballot passes. Dean Coclin CSCWG Chair Ballot Content Purpose of Ballot …

*NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD* ** This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forum's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period is for a Final Guideline (60 day Review Period). Attached is a complete Draft Guideline subject of this Review Notice. Ballot for Review: Ballot CSCWG-1 https://cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2019-June/000043.html Start of Review Period: June 13, 2019 at …

Ballot 180 has passed – see results below. Ballot 180 Results CAs – 18 yes, 0 no, 3 abstain (plus one yes vote on the Management list, which will not be counted) Browsers – 5 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain Result: Ballot 180 passes (requires 2/3 affirmative vote by CAs and majority affirmative vote by browsers).  Quorum is 10 votes …

Voting on Ballot 172, “Removal of Permanent Identifier” has now closed. The results are as follows: From the CAs, we received 9 YES votes, 1 NO vote and 7 Abstentions From the Browsers, we received 1 YES vote, 0 NO votes and 0 Abstentions Therefore the ballot passes.  Full results can be seen on the ballot tracker: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FBsMZjlzyvK3mFR1u4qMqvZwlI86yJ-v0am1pCBo8uI/edit#gid=4 Dean Coclin …

Voting on Ballot 158 (Code Signing BRs) closed on 17 December 2015.   The results are as follows: In the CA category, 17 CAs voted YES, 1 voted NO and 3 Abstained In the Browser category, 2 browsers voted YES, 3 browsers voted NO and none Abstained Therefore the ballot fails. Detailed results can be seen here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FBsMZjlzyvK3mFR1u4qMqvZwlI86yJ-v0am1pCBo8uI/edit#gid=4   After a …

Voting on Ballot 132 (amending the EV Code Signing Timestamp Validity Period) closed 16 September 2014.  Voting in favor were:  Actalis, Comodo, DigiCert, Disig, Entrust, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, OpenTrust, Symantec, Trend Micro, WoSign, ANF, Certum, Mozilla and Microsoft.  There were no votes against and no abstentions.  Therefore, Ballot 132 passed. Ballot 132 – EV Code Signing Timestamp Validity Period Rationale for …