[cabfpub] SHA1 options for payment processors

Richard Barnes rbarnes at mozilla.com
Fri Mar 11 08:32:51 MST 2016

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>> To that end, if there is a party scheduled for the call, I must
>> regrettably remark that we will participate in the discussion. It needs to
>> be public and transparent, to which only the list presently affords that.
> That is to say, we will *not* participate in the discussion, if it's held
> on the call.
> We're happy to discuss on the list, publicly and transparently, as is
> befitting an issue that affects users around the world, and affects every
> site that successfully migrated to SHA-256 successfully. This is simply too
> large an issue to sweep under the rug of non-disclosure.

Dean: To your point about "willingness to engage", we are also very willing
to discuss whether exceptions are appropriate, but we agree with Ryan that
these discussions need to be open and transparent.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160311/b6352504/attachment.html 

More information about the Public mailing list