Ballots

Voting on Ballot Forum-18 has closed and the quorum was met. Results are below: CAs voting in favor: Actalis, Buypass, Comsign, DigiCert, Disig, eMudhra, Entrust, Fastly, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, Izenpe, JPRS, OISTE, SECOM, Sectigo, SSL.com, SwissSign, TrustCor, Visa Against: None Abstaining: None Certificate Consumers voting in Favor: Apple, Google, Mozilla, 360 Against: NoneAbstaining: None Therefore the ballot has PASSED. …

Results of Review Period (Mailing list post is available here.) The IPR review period ended on June 25, 2022 and no exclusion notices were filed. The final documents, with the effective date being 2022-06-29, are available here. Summary of Review Ballot for ReviewBallot CSC-14 – Convert Code Signing Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 FrameworkStart of Review Period26 May 2022 at 18:00 UTCEnd of Review Period25 June …

Attendees Atsushi Inaba, Ben Wilson, Bruce Morton, Corey Bonnell, Dean Coclin, Ian McMillan, Joanna Fox, Martijn Katerbarg, Michael Sykes, Tim Crawford Minutes Minute Taker: Dean Antitrust statement was read Prior meeting minutes of April 21st, approved. CSC-13 Subscriber Private Key Protection Ballot (Bruce) No IPR review responses have been received and once period ends tomorrow, a notice will go out …

Results of Review Period (Mailing list post is available here.) The review period has ended and no exclusion notices were filed. The final documents, with the effective date being 2022-05-09, are available here. Results of Voting (Mailing list post is available here.) YesNoAbstainCertificate IssuersCertum (Asseco)DigiCerteMudhraEntrustHARICASectigoSSL.comCertificate ConsumersMicrosoftThe ballot has PASSED. Purpose of the Ballot Update the subscriber private key protection requirements …

Voting Results Certificate Issuers 18 votes total, with no abstentions: 18 Yes votes: Amazon, Buypass, DigiCert, eMudhra, Entrust, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, Izenpe, JPRS, NAVER, OISTE, Sectigo, SwissSign, TrustCor, SecureTrust, Visa 0 No Votes 0 Abstentions Certificate Consumers 6 votes total, with no abstentions: 6 Yes votes: 360, Apple, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla 0 No votes 0 Abstentions Bylaw Requirements Bylaw 2.3(f) requires: …

Results of Voting (Mailing list post is available here.) YesNoAbstainCertificate IssuersDigiCertEntrustGlobalSignHARICASecureTrustCertificate ConsumersMicrosoftThe ballot has FAILED. Purpose of the ballot Update the subscriber private key protection requirements in the Baseline Requirement for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Code Signing Certificates v2.7. The following motion has been proposed by Ian McMillan of Microsoft, and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and …

Voting Results Certificate Issuers 21 votes total, with no abstentions: 21 Yes votes: Amazon, Certigna (DHIMYOTIS), Certum (Asseco), Chunghwa Telecom, DigiCert, Disig, eMudhra, Entrust, Firmaprofesional, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, Izenpe, JPRS, Let’s Encrypt / ISRG, SSL.com, TWCA, TrustCor, SecureTrust, Visa0 No Votes0 Abstentions Certificate Consumers 5 votes total, with no abstentions: 5 Yes votes: Apple, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla 0 No votes0 Abstentions …

This email begins the discussion period for Ballot NS-001: Adopt Network and Certificate System Security Requirements. PURPOSE OF BALLOTThe purpose of this ballot is for the Networking Security Working Group to formally adopt version 1.7 of the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements as currently published by the CA/Browser Forum.  MOTIONThe following motion has been proposed by Clint Wilson of …

Voting Results The voting on ballot SC53 has completed, and the ballot has passed. Certificate Issuers 21 votes total, with no abstentions: 21 Yes votes: Buypass, Certigna (DHIMYOTIS), Certum (Asseco), Chunghwa Telecom, D-TRUST, DigiCert, Disig, eMudhra, Entrust, Firmaprofesional, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, Izenpe, JPRS, Let’s Encrypt / ISRG, OISTE, Sectigo, TrustCor, SecureTrust0 No Votes0 Abstentions Certificate Consumers 5 votes total, with …

Ballot SC-52 version 2: Specify CRL Validity Intervals in Seconds This ballot expired before entering the voting period.   Purpose of Ballot: Similar to Ballot SC-31 which modified the specification of OCSP validity periods to be in seconds, this ballot modifies the specification of CRL validity periods to be in seconds to avoid confusion about exactly which periods are valid …