Ballot SC-78: Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Voting Results
Certificate Issuers
20 votes total, with no abstentions:
- 20 Issuers voting YES: Asseco, Buypass, Disig, D-Trust, eMudhra, Entrust, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, IdenTrust, Izenpe, JPRS, OISTE, SECOM, Sectigo, SwissSign, Telia, TrustAsia, TWCA, VikingCloud
- 0 Issuers voting NO
- 0 Issuers ABSTAIN
Certificate Consumers
2 votes total, with no abstentions:
- 2 Consumers voting YES: Apple, Mozilla
- 0 Consumers voting NO
- 0 Consumers ABSTAIN
Bylaws Requirements
Bylaw 2.3(6) requires:
In order for a ballot to be adopted by the Forum, two‐thirds (2/3) or more of the votes cast by the Voting Members in the Certificate Issuer category must be in favour of the ballot. This requirement was MET. at least fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the votes cast by the Voting Members in the Certificate Consumer category must be in favour of the ballot. This requirement was MET. At least one (1) Voting Member in each category must vote in favour of a ballot for the ballot to be adopted. This requirement was MET.
Bylaw 2.3(7) requires:
A ballot result will be considered valid only when more than half of the number of currently active Voting Members has participated. The number of currently active Voting Members is the average number of Voting Member organizations that have participated in the previous three (3) Forum Meetings and Forum Teleconferences. the quorum was 13 for this ballot. This requirement was MET.
Notice of Review Period
This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period of 30 days is for one Final Maintenance Guidelines. The complete Draft Maintenance Guideline that is the subject of this Review Notice is attached to this email, both in red-line and changes-accepted draft format, in Word and PDF versions.
Summary of Review
Ballot for Review: Ballot SC-78: Subject organizationName alignment for DBA / Assumed Name
Start of Review Period: 2 october 2024 at 13:30 UTC
End of Review Period: 2 November 2024 at 13:30 UTC
Members with any Essential Claim(s) to exclude must forward a written Notice to Exclude Essential Claims to the Working Group Chair, Iñigo Barreira, inigo.barreira at sectigo.com, and also must submit a copy to the CA/B Forum public mailing list, (public at cabforum.org) before the end of the Review Period.
For details, please see the current version of the CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights Policy.
(An optional template for submitting an Exclusion Notice is available here)
Ballot Contents
The TLS Baseline Requirements currently state an OV certificate may contain either a DBA / Assumed Name or Legal Name. The EVGs and SBRs allow for the common format of “DBA (Legal Name)”. This ballot aims to align the practices for OV certificates with this.
While still allowing the inclusion of the sole DBA / Assumed Name, it will also allow for the “DBA (Legal Name)” format to be used, allowing CAs to align practices with the EVG and SBRs.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Clint Wilson (Apple) and Enrico Entschew (D-Trust).
Motion begins
MODIFY the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” (“Baseline Requirements”) based on Version 2.0.7 as specified in the following redline:
Motion ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days) • Start time: 2024-09-10 13:00 UTC • End time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days) • Start time: 2024-09-17 13:20 UTC • End time: 2024-09-24 13:20 UTC