CA/Browser Forum
Home » Posts » Ballot SC-69: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Ballot SC-69: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

Voting Results

Certificate Issuers

26 votes total, with no abstentions:

  • 26 Issuers voting YES: Amazon, Buypass, Certum (Asseco), CFCA, Chunghwa Telecom, CommScope, D-TRUST, DigiCert, Disig, Entrust, Fastly, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, IdenTrust, iTrusChina, JPRS, Kamu SM, Let’s Encrypt / ISRG, OISTE, SECOM, Sectigo, SSL.com, SwissSign, Telia Company
  • 0 Issuers voting NO
  • 0 Issuers ABSTAIN

Certificate Consumers

2 votes total, with no abstentions:

  • 2 Consumers voting YES: Google, Mozilla
  • 0 Consumers voting NO
  • 0 Consumers ABSTAIN

Bylaws Requirements

Bylaw 2.3(6) requires:

In order for a ballot to be adopted by the Forum, two‐thirds (2/3) or more of the votes cast by the Voting Members in the Certificate Issuer category must be in favour of the ballot. This requirement was MET. at least fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the votes cast by the Voting Members in the Certificate Consumer category must be in favour of the ballot. This requirement was MET. At least one (1) Voting Member in each category must vote in favour of a ballot for the ballot to be adopted. This requirement was MET.

Bylaw 2.3(7) requires:

A ballot result will be considered valid only when more than half of the number of currently active Voting Members has participated. The number of currently active Voting Members is the average number of Voting Member organizations that have participated in the previous three (3) Forum Meetings and Forum Teleconferences. the quorum was 16 for this ballot. This requirement was MET.

Notice of Review Period

This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period of 30 days is for one Final Maintenance Guidelines. The complete Draft Maintenance Guideline that is the subject of this Review Notice is attached to this email, both in red-line and changes-accepted draft format, in Word and PDF versions.

Summary of Review

Ballot for Review: Ballot SC-69: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements

TLS-BRs

TLS-BRs-redlined.pdf

TLS-BRs.docx

Start of Review Period: 13 March 2024 at 18:00 UTC

End of Review Period: 13 April 2024 at 18:00 UTC

Members with any Essential Claim(s) to exclude must forward a written Notice to Exclude Essential Claims to the Working Group Chair, Iñigo Barreira, inigo.barreira at sectigo.com, and also must submit a copy to the CA/B Forum public mailing list, (public at cabforum.org) before the end of the Review Period.

For details, please see the current version of the CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights Policy.

(An optional template for submitting an Exclusion Notice is available here)

Ballot Contents

Purpose of the Ballot

This ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged as part of the “Firewall and router activities” logging requirement in the Baseline Requirements.

This ballot is proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Daniel Jeffery (Fastly) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).

Motion begins

This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" (“TLS Baseline Requirements”), based on Version 2.0.2.

MODIFY the TLS Baseline Requirements as specified in the following Redline: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...d5bd141e14de098ff00c10de7cf500668cbc6843

Motion ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for this ballot is as follows:

Start time (11:00 UTC)End time (11:00 UTC)
Discussion (at least 7 days)2024-02-262024-03-04
Expected Vote for approval (7 days)2024-03-042024-03-11
Edit this page
The Certification Authority Browser Forum (CA/Browser Forum) is a voluntary gathering of Certificate Issuers and suppliers of Internet browser software and other applications that use certificates (Certificate Consumers).