Home » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot CSC-9 – Spring 2021 Cleanup and Clarification

Ballot CSC-9 – Spring 2021 Cleanup and Clarification

IPR Review Results

The review period has ended and no exclusion notices were filed.

The final documents, with the effective date being 9 September 2021, are available here.

Voting Results

Voting on Ballot CSC-9 has concluded and the ballot has passed. Below are the results:

CAs voting in favor: Actalis, Certum (Asseco), DigiCert, eMudhra, Entrust, GlobalSign, HARICA, Sectigo, SSL.com, SecureTrust

CAs opposed: None CAs abstaining: None

Certificate Consumers:

In Favor: Microsoft

Opposed: None

Abstaining: None

The Chair instructs the Vice Chair to create the guideline as voted.

Dean Coclin

CSCWG Chair

Purpose of this ballot

Cleanup and clarify requirements in the Baseline Requirement for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Code Signing Certificates v2.3.

The following motion has been proposed by Bruce Morton, and endorsed by Ian McMillan of Microsoft and Corey Bonnell of DigiCert.

Motion begins

This ballot modifies the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates“ version 2.3 according to the following redline.

Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Code Signing Ballot CSC-9

Motion ends

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days) Start Time: 2021-07-20, 11:30 Eastern Time (US) End Time: not before 2021-07-27, 11:30 Eastern Time (US)

Vote for approval (7 days) Start Time:

Latest releases

Server Certificate Requirements
SC095v3: Clean-up 2025 - Apr 2, 2026

Code Signing Requirements
v3.8 - Aug 5, 2024

What’s Changed CSC-25: Import EV Guidelines to CS Baseline Requirements by @dzacharo in https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/38 Full Changelog: https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/v3.7...v3.8

S/MIME Requirements
v1.0.13 - Ballot SMC015v2 - Mar 28, 2026

This ballot introduces requirements that a CA or RA must follow to rely upon a Mobile Drivers License (mDL) to provide evidence for the authentication of individual identity. It allows the use of mDL that conform to ISO/IEC 18013-5 and which may be verified by the CA or RA in conformance with ISO/IEC 18013-7. The CA or RA shall only accept mDL from an Issuing Authority that is legally authorized by the relevant government or jurisdiction to issue driving licenses. The draft also aligns the subsections of 3.2.4.2 (Validation of individual identity) to correspond more closely with those in 3.2.4.1 (Attribute collection of individual identity). It also includes minor editorial corrections. SMC015v2 was updated to remove an additional reference to the superceded ETSI EN 319 403. This ballot is proposed by Stephen Davidson (DigiCert) and endorsed by Ben Wilson (Mozilla) and Scott Rea (eMudhra).

Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
Version 2.0.5 (Ballot NS-008) - Jul 9, 2025