CA/Browser Forum
Home » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 79 – Mailing List Usage

Ballot 79 – Mailing List Usage

Ballot 79 – Mailing List Usage (Passed)

Gervase Markham made the following motion and Chris Palmer and Eddy Nigg endorsed it:

Wishing to establish guidelines for the use of the new public mailing list,

… Motion begins….

Effective immediately, the Forum resolves that:

  1. Draft and final agenda for Forum meetings (both virtual and in-person, and including any sub-groups or committees) will be posted to the public list.

  2. Draft minutes of Forum meetings (both virtual and in-person, and including any sub-groups or committees) will be posted to the private list to allow members to make sure they are being correctly reported.

Minutes will be considered Final when approved at a subsequent Forum meeting, or after 2 weeks have elapsed since publication of the draft if no meeting is imminent. Final minutes will then be posted to the public list. The Chair will, upon request, make redactions of any part of the public copy of the minutes identified as private or sensitive by either the information discloser or a member mentioned or affiliated with the subject of the information.

  1. Messages formally moving a Forum motion and announcing ballot outcomes, including vote and quorum counts, will be posted to the public list. The details of who voted for what will continue to be posted, now as a separate message, to the private list.

  2. In other cases, individuals have discretion about which mailing list they use, but are strongly encouraged to use the public mailing list for matters other than security incidents or those which require commercial confidentiality.

Members are strongly discouraged from posting the text of private-list messages to the public list without the permission of the author. If this motion passes, the ballot outcome message will be posted to the public list under 3) above.

The ballot review period comes into effect at 21:00 UTC on 11 July 2012 and will close at 21:00 UTC on 18 July 2012. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 21:00 UTC on 25 July 2012. Votes must be cast by “reply all” to this message.

A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.

Motion ends

Latest releases
Code Signing Requirements
v3.8 - Aug 5, 2024

What’s Changed CSC-25: Import EV Guidelines to CS Baseline Requirements by @dzacharo in https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/38 Full Changelog: https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/v3.7...v3.8

S/MIME Requirements
v1.0.6 - Ballot SMC08 - Aug 29, 2024

This ballot sets a date by which issuance of certificates following the Legacy generation profiles must cease. It also includes the following minor updates: Pins the domain validation procedures to v 2.0.5 of the TLS Baseline Requirements while the ballot activity for multi-perspective validation is concluded, and the SMCWG determines its corresponding course of action; Updates the reference for SmtpUTF8Mailbox from RFC 8398 to RFC 9598; and Small text corrections in the Reference section

Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
v2.0 - Ballot NS-003 - Jun 26, 2024

Ballot NS-003: Restructure the NCSSRs in https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/pull/35

Edit this page
The Certification Authority Browser Forum (CA/Browser Forum) is a voluntary gathering of Certificate Issuers and suppliers of Internet browser software and other applications that use certificates (Certificate Consumers).