CA/Browser Forum
Home » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 62 – Adopt Baseline Requirements Draft 50

Ballot 62 – Adopt Baseline Requirements Draft 50

Ballot 62 – Adopt Baseline Requirements Draft 50 (Passed)

Motion

Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Bruce Morton and Eddy Nigg endorsed it:

Motion begins

The CA/Browser Forum adopts the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates” Draft 50 (available here:

)

as Version 1.0 and sets an Effective Date of 1 July 2012.

It instructs the editor to restyle the draft as a Forum Guideline and arrange for it to be posted to the cabforum.org Web site.

The members expect all SSL CAs and (in particular) all member CAs to implement the resulting Forum Guideline in their operating procedures by the Effective Date.

The members request that the member browser suppliers incorporate the resulting Forum Guideline into their root-embedding program requirements as soon as is practical (but not before the Effective Date).

The members further request that the WebTrust Task Force and ETSI adapt their SSL CA audit criteria to include the resulting Forum Guidelines as soon as is practical (but not before the Effective Date).

The ballot review period comes into effect at 2100 UTC on 8 Nov ’11 and will close at 2100 UTC on 15 Nov ’11. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2100 UTC on 22 Nov ’11. Votes must be cast by “reply all” to this email.

Motion ends

A vote in favour of the motion must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.

Voting members are listed here:

In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and one half or more of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favour. Also, at least six members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favour, voting against or abstaining.

Latest releases
Server Certificate Requirements
BRs/2.1.2 SC-080 V3: Sunset the use of WHOIS to identify Domain Contacts and relying DCV Methods - Dec 16, 2024

Ballot SC-080 V3: “Sunset the use of WHOIS to identify Domain Contact… (https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/560) Ballot SC-080 V3: “Sunset the use of WHOIS to identify Domain Contacts and relying DCV Methods” (https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/555)

Code Signing Requirements
v3.8 - Aug 5, 2024

What’s Changed CSC-25: Import EV Guidelines to CS Baseline Requirements by @dzacharo in https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/38 Full Changelog: https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/v3.7...v3.8

S/MIME Requirements
v1.0.8 - Ballot SMC010 - Dec 23, 2024

This ballot adopts Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration (MPIC) for CAs when conducting Email Domain Control Validation (DCV) and Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) checks for S/MIME Certificates. The Ballot adopts the MPIC implementation consistent with the TLS Baseline Requirements. Acknowledging that some S/MIME CAs with no TLS operations may require additional time to deploy MPIC, the Ballot has a Compliance Date of May 15, 2025. Following that date the implementation timeline described in TLS BR section 3.2.2.9 applies. This ballot is proposed by Stephen Davidson (DigiCert) and endorsed by Ashish Dhiman (GlobalSign) and Nicolas Lidzborski (Google).

Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
v2.0 - Ballot NS-003 - Jun 26, 2024

Ballot NS-003: Restructure the NCSSRs in https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/pull/35

Edit this page
The Certification Authority Browser Forum (CA/Browser Forum) is a voluntary gathering of Certificate Issuers and suppliers of Internet browser software and other applications that use certificates (Certificate Consumers).