CA/Browser Forum
Home » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 44 – IFAC Membership

Ballot 44 – IFAC Membership

Ballot 44 – IFAC Membership (Passed Unanimously)

Motion

Ben Wilson made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg and Bruce Morton endorsed it:

The existing definition of “Accounting Practitioner” contemplates that an Accounting Practitioner is licensed by an entity that is a member of the International Federation of Accountants. IFAC Membership is not restricted to licensing and regulatory activities. “Each member body determines the specific criteria for its members, in accordance with any applicable legislation or regulation” and “[IFAC members] carry out such programs on their own behalf, on behalf of the profession, or on behalf of governments, regulators or other agencies [and some] programs are carried out by another body.”

Thus, some countries have multiple members of IFAC, while in other countries the IFAC Member is not the same as the Regulatory/Licensing body. Therefore, it is proposed that the definition of “Accounting Practitioner” and subsection (1)(A) (Status of Author) of section 10.10.2 Verified Accountant Letter be amended as follows:

Motion begins

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY

Erratum begins

In 3. Definitions, DELETE:- Accounting Practitioner: A certified public accountant, chartered accountant, or equivalent licensed by a full member of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) to practice accounting in the country of the Applicant’s Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration or any jurisdiction where the Applicant maintains an office or physical facility.

And in 3. Definitions, INSERT: Accounting Practitioner: A certified public accountant, chartered accountant, or a person with an equivalent license within the country of the Applicant’s Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration or any jurisdiction where the Applicant maintains an office or physical facility; provided that an accounting standards body in the jurisdiction maintains full (not “suspended” or “associate”) membership status with the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

In 10.10.2(1), DELETE: (A) Status of Author: The CA MUST verify that the accountant letter is authored by an independent professional accountant retained by and representing the Applicant (or an in-house professional accountant employed by the Applicant) (Accounting Practitioner) who is a certified public accountant, chartered accountant, or equivalent licensed by a full member of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) to practice accounting in the country of the Applicant’s Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration or any jurisdiction where the Applicant maintains an office or physical facility;

And in 10.10.2(1), INSERT: (A) Status of Author: The CA MUST verify that the accountant letter is authored by an independent Accounting Practitioner retained by and representing the Applicant (or an in-house professional accountant employed by the Applicant) who is a certified public accountant, chartered accountant, or has an equivalent license within the Applicant’s Jurisdiction of Incorporation, Jurisdiction of Registration, or the jurisdiction where the Applicant maintains an office or physical facility. Verification of license MUST be through that jurisdiction’s member of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) or through the regulatory organization in that jurisdiction appropriate to contact when verifying an accountant’s license to practice in that jurisdiction.

Erratum ends

Motion ends

The ballot review period comes into effect at 2100 UTC on 9 Apr ’10 and will close at 2100 UTC on 16 Apr ’10. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2100 UTC on 23 Apr ’10.

Votes must be cast by ‘reply all’ to this email.

A vote in favour of the motion must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted.

The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.

Latest releases
Code Signing Requirements
v3.8 - Aug 5, 2024

What’s Changed CSC-25: Import EV Guidelines to CS Baseline Requirements by @dzacharo in https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/38 Full Changelog: https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/v3.7...v3.8

S/MIME Requirements
v1.0.6 - Ballot SMC08 - Aug 29, 2024

This ballot sets a date by which issuance of certificates following the Legacy generation profiles must cease. It also includes the following minor updates: Pins the domain validation procedures to v 2.0.5 of the TLS Baseline Requirements while the ballot activity for multi-perspective validation is concluded, and the SMCWG determines its corresponding course of action; Updates the reference for SmtpUTF8Mailbox from RFC 8398 to RFC 9598; and Small text corrections in the Reference section

Network and Certificate System Security Requirements
v2.0 - Ballot NS-003 - Jun 26, 2024

Ballot NS-003: Restructure the NCSSRs in https://github.com/cabforum/netsec/pull/35

Edit this page
The Certification Authority Browser Forum (CA/Browser Forum) is a voluntary gathering of Certificate Issuers and suppliers of Internet browser software and other applications that use certificates (Certificate Consumers).